Cavilabiata
Lineage (NCBI):
root
» Eukaryota
» Opisthokonta
» Metazoa
» Eumetazoa
» Bilateria
» Coelomata
» Protostomia
» Ecdysozoa
» Panarthropoda
» Arthropoda
» Mandibulata
» Pancrustacea
» Hexapoda
» Insecta
» Dicondylia
» Pterygota <winged insects>
» Palaeoptera
» Odonata
» Anisoptera/Anisozygoptera group
» Anisoptera <dragonflies>
» Cavilabiata
node name Cavilabiata Look for this name in NCBI Wikipedia Animal Diversity Web | ||
recommended citations http://palaeo-electronica.org/content/fc-8 Kohli et al., 2016 |
||
node minimum age 168 Ma The Daohugou-Biota, resting on the Jiulongshan Formation, has been dated with SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age of 168-152 Ma, giving a minimum age for Jiulongshan Formation of 168 Ma (Liu et al., 2006). There is debate about the age of the Jiulongshan Formation, as radioisotopic studies have not been congruent (Liu et al., 2012). However, because the Daohugou Formation overlies the Jiulonshan formation, we can conservatively use the age range of the former to provide a minimum age as 168 Ma for the calibrating fossil. | ||
node maximum age None specified | ||
primary fossil used to date this node | ||
NIGP 148312 | ||
phylogenetic justification
he phylogenetic relationship of this fossil with Aeshnidae and hence Anisoptera is strongly supported by many wing venational synapomorphies (Bechly et al., 2001; Nel and Huang, 2009). These include: the presence of Rsp1 vein, RP1 and RP2 basally parallel up to the pterostigma, and RP3/4 and MA undulating. |
||
phylogenetic reference(s)
chly, G., Nel, A., Martínez-Declòs, X., Jarzembowski, E.A., Coram, R., Martill, D., Fleck, G., Escuillié, F., Wisshak, M.M., and Maisch, M. 2001. A revision and phylogenetic study of Mesozoic Aeshnoptera, with description of numerous new taxa (Insecta: Odonata: Anisoptera). Neue Paläontologische Abhandlungen, 4:1-219.
Nel, A. and Huang, D. 2009. First Chinese Cymatophlebiidae from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia (Odonata: Anisoptera: Aeshnoptera). Palaeodiversity, 2:199-204.
|
||
tree image (click image for full size) | ||
Figure 3 from Kohli et al. (2016).
|